Rafael Jodar vs Andre Ilagan Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How does their second serve success compare? Andre Ilagan recently secured 43.42% of points on his second serve, slightly below Rafael Jodar's 43.78%. This marginal difference is often significant in determining match outcomes.
• In terms of return game, Andre Ilagan has capitalized on 47.56% of his opponent's second serves, outshining Rafael Jodar's 44.31% success rate. Yet, for first serve returns, the difference is negligible, with Ilagan at 25.92% and Jodar at 26.05%.
• Under pressure, Ilagan saves 56.82% of breakpoints, demonstrating a slight edge over Jodar's 52.35% success rate in stressful situations.
• Over the past year, Ilagan has clinched 51.43% of his matches, whereas Jodar boasts a more impressive 69.44% win ratio.
• Who performs better on hard surfaces? Both players excel, each achieving a 63% win rate, showcasing their proficiency on this surface.
• Has tournament level influenced their success? Ilagan competes mostly in Challengers/ITF > $10K, winning 52.54%, whereas Jodar prevails in similar events with a 69.44% success rate.
• When considering opponent quality, Ilagan faces competitors ranked at an average of 363.66, compared to Jodar's 336.17, implying Jodar generally encounters slightly tougher opponents.
• In cases where matches demand a deciding set, Ilagan wins 38% of these challenging encounters, significantly trailing Jodar's impressive 75% success rate.

Editorial Prediction (September 30, 2025, UTC):

As Andre Ilagan and Rafael Jodar prepare for their upcoming match, meticulous analysis of their recent performances suggests a competitive encounter. While both demonstrate competent second serve capabilities, Jodar holds a slight statistical edge. However, Ilagan's better performance in returning second serves may level the playing field.

The players are evenly matched on their preferred hard surface, but the critical differential lies in their capacity to perform under pressure and handle high-stakes situations such as breakpoints and deciding sets. Ilagan's breakpoint resilience is noteworthy but not as compelling as Jodar's ability to clinch deciding sets with higher consistency.

Assessing their competition history and match success rates over the past year, Jodar's higher win percentage and more challenging opponent encounters provide a compelling narrative in his favor. Considering these factors, Rafael Jodar appears to have a slight advantage and is likely to emerge victorious in their forthcoming confrontation.